hwacams.blogg.se

Step-By Step To Download this book:Click The Button "DOWNLOAD"Sign UP registration to access Picking Cotton: Our Memoir of Injustice and Redemption &UNLIMITED BOOKSDOWNLOAD as many books as you like (personal use)CANCEL the membership at ANY TIME if not satisfiedJoin Over 80.000 & Happy Readers. Download Picking Cotton: Our Memoir of Injustice and Redemption Ebook | READ ONLINE

#book #readonline #ebook #pdf #kindle #epub Picking Cotton: Our Memoir of Injustice and Redemption download free of book in format PDF Picking Cotton: Our Memoir of Injustice and Redemption in format PDF Picking Cotton: Our Memoir of Injustice and Redemption download ebook PDF EPUB book in english language And she has written a book with Cotton, scheduled for release early next year, about wrongful convictions and their unusual partnership to address the causes of this injustice and reforms to prevent it from happening again.Download Picking Cotton: Our Memoir of Injustice and Redemption Ebook | READ ONLINEĭownload Picking Cotton: Our Memoir of Injustice and Redemption read ebook Online PDF EPUB KINDLE Eyewitness misidentification played a role in more than three-quarters of wrongful convictions overturned by DNA testing, and Thompson-Cannino and Cotton now travel the country telling audiences how it can happen. But she was wrong.ĭNA testing exonerated Cotton after he had served more than a decade in prison. She told the jury she was certain, and Cotton was sentenced to life. Thompson-Cannino, who is white, helped police draw up a composite sketch, and then she viewed photographs and identified Ronald Cotton as the rapist.

When an African-American attacker broke into her home and raped her in 1984, she made a conscious effort to note the perpetrator’s features so she could identify him later. Jennifer Thompson-Cannino (above) knows first-hand how a misidentification can happen. More than one-third of these wrongful convictions were caused by a cross-racial identification. And statistics on the 218 wrongful convictions overturned by DNA testing to date support the evidence. Social science research has shown that eyewitness misidentifications are more likely to happen when the perpetrator and witness are of different racial backgrounds.